“
The reading of a building need not result in a sequential,
progressive, and ultimately singular narrative; instead,
its meanings can be temporally complex, partial, and
contingent.”
--Peter Eisenman
In
his introduction, Eisenman begins with the premise
that his book is as much about himself and his way
of viewing architecture as it is about Terragni, Eisenman
proceeds to tackle the subject with a series of two-color
drawings and diagrams supporting a complex and accessible
text. Complemented by archival drawings from Terragni’s
studio, and slightly altered period photographs. At
times difficult, the reader will be forced to stop
and examine the drawings, which have been carefully
and beautifully delineated by Peter Eisenman.
The
book’s subtitle, Transformations, Decompositions,
Critiques, serves as the structuring device for the
text. The Casa del Fascio is “transformed,”
the Casa Giuliani-Frigerio is “decomposed,’
and the “critiques” are essays by Terragni
himself (on the Casa del Fascio, first published in
1936), and by the renowned Italian architectural historian
and theorist Manfredo Tafuri (“Terragni, Subject
and Mask,” first published in Oppositions in
the 1980s). It is significant that Eisenman uses the
term “decomposition”, a word Terragni
used (in his Relazione sul Danteum, 1938), and Eisenman
is in fact, decomposing the facades of the Casa Giuliani-Frigerio.
“In
writing of Terragni, Eisenman redesigns him; the free
present is a further theoretical manifesto sustaining
his architecture without a homeland, liberated beyond
space and time. Eisenman too is a master of the art
of simulation.”
--Manfredo Tafuri
Peter
Eisenman’s method of analysis is removed from
the traditional approaches, which are based on social,
historical, aesthetic, and functional point of view.
Instead, Eisenman describes the articulations and
openings on the facades as constituting a set of marks.
These notations provide the basis for his analysis,
for example, in the Casa del Fascio, each of the four
sequential design schemes records the previous state,
encoding the process of transformation in the final
building.
Any
architect or student, whom appreciates the methodology
of the architectural design, will return to Professor
Eisenman’s thoughtful and exhaustive opus again
and again.